|
|
Copyright Issues for Electronic Resources
Disclaimer:
Copyright is a complex issue, delineated and
argued by those with recognized expertise and legal
credentials. Since this document is created by Information
Services, and not by an attorney or any other officer of the
law with such recognized credentials, it should not be regarded
as an official legal document providing the complete and
absolute parameters of copyright law.
This guide, offered to students and faculty as they proceed
to create multimedia materials to be made available through the
Internet, is meant to promote compliance with copyright law.
The information provided here errs on the conservative side of
the law so as to avoid potential legal ramifications. A list of
Web sites concerned with copyright law is provided at the end
of this guide.
Copyright and Infringement:
Copyright is a collection of legally binding
parameters which afford the creator of an original work the
retention of the exclusive rights:
- To reproduce it;
- To distribute copies of it (by sale, rental,
lease, or lending);
- To perform or display the work publicly;
- To prepare further derivative works based upon the original.
Where in the past, registration of a work and/or the inclusion
of a notice were required for it to be included within the
encompassing guidelines of copyright protection, this is now
achieved automatically when an original work of authorship is
fixed in a tangible medium of expression. The term of the
protection of these rights for any work created before 1978
lasts 95 years. In comparison, any work created during or after
1978 is protected for the life of the author plus 70 years.
However, as staunch as copyright protection may seem, denial
of the use of a copyrighted work by anyone other than the
author or someone to whom s/he has granted a license is not so
absolute. Three circumstances allow for the use of a work by
someone other than the author, without the need to gain a
license:
- If the use is fair use;
- If the work used is in the public domain;
- If the material used is factual or an idea.
Of these three, "Fair Use" is the one which provides the most
latitude when using copyrighted materials for educational
purposes. Yet, it is also the one which creates the most
indefinite arena in which to consider that use.
Fair Use:
Fair use is that circumstance within which exceptions for
educational use of copyrighted materials are made. These
include criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching,
scholarship or research. Yet, be aware that compliance with
such exceptions is decided neither arbitrarily nor within a
framework of absolutes. Rather, each case is interpreted using
four factors to weigh and balance where infringement is in
question. This procedure allows for creative and responsible
conclusions to be attained regarding the lawfulness of the
activities in question.
These four factors are:
- The purpose and character of the use. The use of
the copyrighted work in question should be for nonprofit
educational purposes, not for commercial profit, to gain
the favor of this factor.
- The nature of the copyrighted work. The nature
of a copyrighted work used for educational purposes should
not be one of a commercial nature directed at an
educational market to gain the favor of this factor, since
reproducing the copyrighted work in some form may prevent
the creator of the original work remuneration for his/her
efforts.
- The amount and substantiality of the portion used in
relation to the copyrighted work as a whole. In terms
of quantity, the more of the original that one uses, the
more one approaches the infringement of its copyright
protection, and hence, disfavor in the balance of this
factor. Likewise, in terms of quality, should the portion
of the original that one uses be "the heart of the work,"
albeit small, the closer one comes to infringing on the
copyright protection of that work. Such a condition also
falls within the disfavor of the balance of this factor.
A rule of thumb for limiting the amount of different types
of works that can be used is the following:
- Motion Picture: up to 10% or 3 minutes of a
copyrighted motion media work may be reproduced or
incorporated into a project.
- Text material: up to 10% or 1000 words may
be used; a poem of less than 250 words may be used; no
more than three poems by the same poet, or five poems
by different poets from an anthology.
- Music, Lyrics, and Music Video: up to 10%,
but no more than 30 seconds, of the music and lyrics
from a musical work may be used. Any alteration shall
not change the basic melody or the fundamental
character of the work.
- Illustrations and Photographs: a photograph
or illustration may be used in its entirety but no more
than 5 images by the same artist/photographer may be
used. From a published collective work, no more than
10% or 15 images, whichever is less, may be used.
- Numerical Data Sets: up to 10% or 2500
fields or cell entries from a copyrighted database or
data table may be used.
- The effect of the use upon the potential market for,
or value of, the copyrighted work. In general, should
the use of the copyrighted work negatively impact the
potential market for its sale, or its value, it would fall
to the side of disfavor for this factor.
Copyright in an Online Environment:
"Fair Use", as a forum in which to consider the educational
use of copyrighted works against potential infringement, is
flexible enough to take into account the variety of mediums in
which those works come to exist: print, text, stills, graphs,
sound, video, music, animated clips, etc. However, the
expanding development of multimedia materials, where any number
and variety of copyrighted works may be incorporated into a
single effort, is increasing the complexity of potential
copyright infringement, and in turn, testing the limits of
"Fair Use" flexibility. Pushing the envelope of "Fair Use"
still further, is the opportunity to make these multimedia
works broadly available through the Internet. While "Fair Use"
continues to be a reliable touchstone when integrating material
into a multimedia work - considering each work individually -
and for making that work, or any other single work, available
through the Internet, questions about the potential
infringement upon copyrighted works when doing so have
escalated beyond its scope. Such tension has predictably given
form to a number of recommendations that may soon be feathered
into the "Fair Use" forum for the purpose of addressing the
educational use of these new developments. For the time being,
these recommendations are offered in the spirit of this guide:
- Since "Fair Use" holds that copyrighted materials used
for educational purposes must be a regular part of mediated
instruction, limiting access of the materials only to those
students who are the intended recipients is tantamount
with compliance. Fulfilling this term of "Fair Use" in an
online environment can be accomplished through the use of
password protection to prevent unauthorized use.
- Even with password protection in place, however,
limiting the number of copies made available remains an
issue. This concerns the number of copies made available to
students and their potential use of those copies. While
limiting copies made available to students is easily
achieved through placing an electronic copy of any part of
a copyrighted work on a central media server, limiting
their use of that copy is less than enforceable. Although a
copy of the copyrighted work cached in the RAM memory of
any computer that downloads it has been accepted as a
necessary part of the overall use of the technology, a
problem arises with preventing the student from reproducing
the read-only copy for other than its intended purpose. To
curb the potential misuse of the downloaded copy, it
behooves faculty to include some notice that informs
students that the material used maybe copyrighted, is part
of the instruction, and not for distribution. Even if only
a short excerpt is used, it is a good practice to give some
form of attribution to the author.
Indicative of support for the above recommendations, and
perhaps foreshadowing their eventual rise as a legal
requirement for "Fair Use" consideration of copyrighted
materials online, "The Digital Millennium Copyright Act"
prohibits anyone from circumventing a "technological
measure" that controls access to copyrighted works and
prohibits removal of "copyright management information."
- More a courtesy than a recommendation, whenever
using frames to design a Web site, open those Web sites to
which you have created a link as a new Web page
rather than within your own frame. Doing so will avoid the
impression that you own or control that Web site. An
additional disclaimer to offer attribution for the linked
site also helps to drive home the point.
Keeping Others from Infringing on Your Work:
As important as it is not to infringe on the copyrights of
others, faculty and students should consider taking measures to
protect against infringement on their own works. For one, place
the copyright protection on your own work. The correct form for
a notice is: "Copyright [dates] by [author/owner]. The word
"Copyright" can be substituted by the Circle-C "©" symbol,
but do not use "(c)" as a substitute.
Related Web sites for Further Consideration:
10 Big Myths about copyright explained
Contradiction in copyright and 11th amendment
Copyright: Guidelines for the Use of Copyright Materials in Multimedia for Educational Purposes
Copyright in the New World of Electronic Publishing
Copyright Information
Copyright Management Center
Explaining consequences of copyright infringement to teachers
Fair Use: Overview and Meaning for Higher Education
Fair Use of Copyrighted Works
FindLaw
I*M Europe Legal Issues - Intellectual Property
Princeton Univ. Press v. Michigan Doc. Servs.
Scholarly Electronic Publishing
Stanford University Libraries: Copyright & Fair Use
Terry Carroll - Copyright FAQ and Copyright Resource Page
The Copyright Licensing Agency
UMass FLRC Copyright References
US Code: Title 17
Welcome to Copyright Clearance Center Online
Technology Instruction | Publishing Information on the Web | Other Resources

Last updated March 7, 2000. Content by David Lavoie
|